Capcom says Seth and Sagat are overpowered in SFIV

[Cr8zyK1LL3r]

“A good player of another character can always beat a good Sagat player or a good Seth player,”
Lol. Wtf. this makes no sense

[Cr8zyK1LL3r]

this post asking asking for whinners to flame you Hue.
lock in up lol.

the forum is getting quiet. We need something to discuss while waiting for the vids lol.

[ABC_SMN]

“A good player of another character can always beat a good Sagat player or a good Seth player,”
Lol. Wtf. this makes no sense

This mean, a Good player can always beat Mago or someone else. lol

[electric]

“A good player of another character can always beat a good Sagat player or a good Seth player,”
Lol. Wtf. this makes no sense

This mean, a Good player can always beat Mago or someone else. lol

LOL yes, I agree... Mago will always lose because he picks Sagat

[Cr8zyK1LL3r]

This mean, a Good player can always beat Mago or someone else. lol

He's saying that it's just hard. But it's not impossible. Let's say:
"a good car can always go faster than F1" It's possible. But at the same time, you will need to overcome the F1 engine first. And the F1 engine is Sagat's power in this case. lol

[Gino]

“A good player of another character can always beat a good Sagat player or a good Seth player,”
Lol. Wtf. this makes no sense

Rather:
A really good player of another character has a better chance of beeting a good sagat player.

[Griever]

i think playable Seth is fine. hes a sneaky prick but hes weak as, but hey, hes a playable boss,what do you expect? otherwise shouldn't be playable. well any who, the updates that are coming up should shake things up abit.

[zos'la]

updates. lawl.
in my honest oppinion, no updates required, the game is fine as it is. I would still prefer the arcade chars in tournaments. But then again console chars would make things just a little more interesting.